EB5 Investors Magazine
By Nicolai Hinrichsen and Stephen Yale-Loehr
In 2015, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services abruptly changed its policy and adjudication standards regarding the approvability of EB-5 I-526 petitions. This change in policy focused on the source of the immigrant investor’s qualifying investment derived from a loan not secured by the investor’s personally-owned assets. Due to the fact that USCIS applied this change retroactively, the policy change has hurt thousands of EB-5 investors and their dependents. This article describes the history of such loans in EB-5 immigrant investor cases, the 2015 change in USCIS policy, and how EB-5 investors can fix or avoid the problem.
General Source of Funds Requirements
Every EB-5 investor must invest “capital” in a new commercial enterprise in the United States. The USCIS’ EB-5 regulations define “capital” as “cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents, and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the alien entrepreneur, provided that the alien entrepreneur is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness.” 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(e).
Sometimes an EB-5 investor may borrow cash from a third party (e.g., a bank, company, friend, or family member) and invest that cash in an EB-5 qualifying new commercial enterprise. Until 2015, the USCIS and its predecessor, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, generally treated cash obtained through the proceeds of a loan no differently than cash obtained through any other lawful means.
Regardless of whether the petitioner obtained the cash as a gift, through wage earnings, or as the proceeds of a loan, cash invested into a new commercial enterprise was treated as “cash.” The immigration agency historically approved petitions based on investments of cash the petitioner obtained through a loan, even if the loan was unsecured or not collateralized by the petitioner’s personal assets, as long as the job-creation and related EB-5 eligibility criteria were satisfied.
Over the years, the USCIS sometimes issued requests for evidence (RFEs) in loan-based EB-5 cases. The USCIS cited 8 C.F.R. § 204.6(j)(2)(v) for the proposition that “if the invested capital is a loan, the petitioner must submit evidence of the loan agreement or other evidence of borrowing which is secured by assets of the petitioner and for which the petitioner is personally and primarily liable.” USCIS eventually approved such cases, based on arguments that the investment proceeds were “cash” and not “indebtedness” (i.e., a promissory note).
USCIS Change in Policy Regarding Loans
Until 2015, EB-5 cases involving unsecured or third party loans were routinely approved.
That changed in early 2015, when USCIS began issuing RFEs and NOIDs on essentially all I-526 petitions involving third party and unsecured loans. In April 2015, the USCIS announced publicly for the first time during an EB-5 stakeholder’s call that it would no longer allow the cash proceeds of an unsecured loan or a loan obtained in which the EB-5 petitioner did not own the collateral securing the loan. Under the new policy, the USCIS claims that an EB-5 investor cannot use loan proceeds as a source of investment capital unless the investor shows that the promise to repay the loan has been secured by assets the investor owns. The USCIS now considers such proceeds “indebtedness” rather than “cash.”
The USCIS is applying its new policy retroactively to EB-5 cases that were already pending. That has hurt many investors with pending petitions, particularly where refiling would cause age-out issues or subject the petitioner to the EB-5 visa backlog. A class action lawsuit is pending in federal court challenging the USCIS’ change in policy. Zhang v. USCIS, 15-cv-995 (EGS) (D.D.C. filed June 23, 2015).
How to Avoid Potential Loan Problems in EB-5 Petitions
While a successful outcome to the class action lawsuit may be the only way to help most pending cases, some strategies can be used to save existing cases in which USCIS has issued an RFE or a NOID. For example, presenting evidence regarding Chinese property and contract law can help in certain cases involving joint ownership of property by petitioners and their parents, children, and other relatives. Nevertheless, given the USCIS’ inconsistent record on this issue, new EB-5 petitioners might consider one of the following steps to avoid an RFE or denial:
- Have the third party gift loan proceeds to the EB-5 investor. The USCIS has accepted such gifts as valid sources of funds, even though the underlying basis of the gift is a loan. For example, if a relative owns an apartment and obtains a mortgage loan on that apartment, have the relative gift the loan proceeds to the EB-5 investor. The USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office specifically approved this kind of transaction in a recent non-precedent decision. Matter of Y-Z-, ID# 18021 (AAO Aug. 25, 2016), available at https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/err/B7%20-%20Immigrant%20Petition%20by%20Alien%20Entrepreneur%2C%20Sec.%20203%28b%29%285%29%20of%20the%20INA/Decisions_Issued_in_2016/AUG252016_01B7203.pdf. If the relative owns only a percentage of the property and the EB-5 investor owns the remainder, structure the loan such that each pro rata percentage is paid out to the relative and the EB-5 investor, respectively. The relative can then gift his or her portion directly to the EB-5 investor, essentially avoiding the indebtedness issue.
- See if the investor’s share of a jointly owned property suffices for EB-5 purposes. Sometimes a parent and relative jointly own a property. Assume, for example, that a son and his mother each own 50 percent of an apartment worth $1.2 million. The mother wants to become an EB-5 investor. If they jointly obtain a mortgage loan for that amount on the apartment, the mother’s 50 percent share is worth $600,000, enough to fund her EB-5 investment. Because the mother’s money is collateralized by her share of the apartment, the USCIS should approve this case, even though it involves a loan. (Note that so far the USCIS has not raised this issue where spouses jointly own the property.)
- Transfer property ownership to the EB-5 investor. An EB-5 investor could choose to transfer ownership from a relative such that the EB-5 investor owns all or a percentage of the asset sufficient to cover the loan. While this is an effective way to overcome any USCIS concerns, such a strategy may result in significant tax liabilities that the EB-5 investor may wish to avoid. In addition, the time necessary to transfer property may significantly delay the EB-5 process.
- Consider other sources of the EB-5 investment. Many ways exist to prove an investor’s lawful source of funds in an EB-5 case. For example, an investor may use his or her earned income, a gift, or sale of a property. None of these involves a loan. If an investor has more than one lawful source of funds, and does not own property sufficient to secure a loan, choose the source that doesn’t involve a loan.
The USCIS’ new policy interpretation barring loan proceeds as EB-5 investments unless the investor has secured the underlying assets is subject to attack. In the meantime, new EB-5 investors can avoid any problems concerning the use of loan proceeds as their EB-5 investment as long as they structure the transaction in one of the ways outlined above.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article are solely the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the publisher, its employees. or its affiliates. The information found on this website is intended to be general information; it is not legal or financial advice. Specific legal or financial advice can only be given by a licensed professional with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances of your particular situation. You should seek consultation with legal, immigration, and financial experts prior to participating in the EB-5 program Posting a question on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. All questions you post will be available to the public; do not include confidential information in your question.
- EB5 Writers Council
- Subscribe for Free
- About the Magazine
- All Issues
- 2023 Chinese V10 I2
- 2023 English V10 I1
- 2022 English V9 I1
- 2021 English V8 I1
- 2020 English V7 I2
- 2019 English V7 I1
- 2019 Vietnamese V2 I1
- 2018 English V6 I2
- 2018 Chinese V5 I2
- 2018 Vietnamese V1 I1
- 2018 English V6 I1
- 2018 Chinese V5 I1
- 2018 English V5 I2
- 2017 Chinese V4 I2
- 2017 Chinese V4 I1
- 2017 English V5 I1
- 2016 English V4 I3
- 2016 Chinese V3 I3
- 2016 English V4 I2
- 2016 Chinese V3 I2
- 2016 English V4 I1
- 2016 Chinese V3 I1
- 2015 English V3 I3
- 2015 Chinese V2 I2
- 2015 English V3 I2
- 2015 Chinese V2 I1
- 2015 English V3 I1
- 2015 English V2 I3
- 2014 Chinese V1 I1
- 2014 English V2 I2
- 2014 English V2 I1
- 2013 English V1 I2
- 2013 English V1 I1
- Editorial Board
- Contributing Writers
- Style Guide
Subscribe to EB5 Investors Magazine
Sign up to receive a free subscription.
I am an expert and enthusiast assistant. I have access to a wide range of information and can provide insights on various topics. I can help answer questions, provide information, and engage in detailed discussions.
Regarding the concepts mentioned in the article you provided, here is some information:
EB-5 Investor Program
The EB-5 Investor Program is a United States immigration program that provides a path to obtaining a green card for foreign nationals who invest a certain amount of money in a new commercial enterprise that creates jobs for U.S. workers. The program requires the investor to invest "capital" in the enterprise, which can include cash, equipment, inventory, and other tangible property. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has specific regulations and requirements for the EB-5 program.
Source of Funds Requirements
To participate in the EB-5 program, investors must demonstrate that their investment capital comes from lawful sources. The USCIS defines "capital" as cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents, and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the investor. However, the assets of the new commercial enterprise cannot be used to secure any of the indebtedness.
Loans in EB-5 Cases
Historically, the USCIS treated cash obtained through the proceeds of a loan no differently than cash obtained through other lawful means. This means that cash invested into a new commercial enterprise was considered "cash" regardless of whether it was obtained through a loan. The USCIS approved petitions based on investments of cash obtained through a loan, even if the loan was unsecured or not collateralized by the investor's personal assets, as long as the job-creation and other EB-5 eligibility criteria were satisfied.
USCIS Change in Policy
In 2015, the USCIS changed its policy regarding loans in EB-5 cases. The new policy stated that loan proceeds cannot be used as a source of investment capital unless the investor shows that the promise to repay the loan has been secured by assets owned by the investor. The USCIS now considers such proceeds as "indebtedness" rather than "cash." This change in policy was applied retroactively to pending EB-5 cases, which has caused difficulties for many investors.
Strategies to Avoid Loan Problems
The article suggests several strategies to avoid potential loan problems in EB-5 petitions. These strategies include having a third party gift loan proceeds to the EB-5 investor, using jointly owned property as a source of investment, transferring property ownership to the EB-5 investor, or considering other sources of investment that do not involve a loan.
It's important to note that the information provided is based on the article you shared. For more specific and up-to-date information, it is recommended to consult with legal, immigration, and financial experts who have full knowledge of the facts and circumstances of your particular situation.
Let me know if there's anything else I can help with!